Our review focuses on whether sources support a claim, whether calculations are reproducible, and whether suggestions are presented as guidance rather than guarantees. Illustrative scenarios should be labelled. A reference list alone does not establish that every recommendation has been tested.
When an error is found after publication we fix it rather than quietly deleting it. Substantive corrections are noted on the article; typos are fixed silently. Reports reach us at mido831@naver.com.
The review standard is to compare important quantities, timings and procedures with primary sources covering that claim. Unsupported suggestions should be labelled as examples or corrected. Review is ongoing article by article; references do not certify every sentence. We distinguish substantive reviews, targeted corrections and routine builds.
We do not accept payment from any product or service in exchange for coverage. Advertising is served automatically by an ad network and is not written into our articles. If we ever introduce affiliate links, they will be labelled clearly.
AI assists drafts, translation and code. A publication date alone does not release a new article; a review record is required. We do not claim that every article has specialist review or that AI guarantees factual accuracy.