Our review focuses on whether sources support a claim, whether calculations are reproducible, and whether suggestions are presented as guidance rather than guarantees. Illustrative scenarios should be labelled. A reference list alone does not establish that every recommendation has been tested.
When an error is found after publication we fix it rather than quietly deleting it. Substantive corrections are noted on the article; typos are fixed silently. Reports reach us at mido831@naver.com.
Where a guide states a number, a temperature, a dosage or a legal deadline, it is checked against a primary source — a government agency, a public health body, a standards organisation or the manufacturer's own documentation — and that source is listed at the foot of the guide with a note on what it supports. Secondary summaries, other blogs and encyclopedias are not used as references. A dated review label is shown when an article has a recorded substantive review; a routine site build does not count as a review.
We do not accept payment from any product or service in exchange for coverage. Advertising is served automatically by an ad network and is not written into our articles. If we ever introduce affiliate links, they will be labelled clearly.